<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volvo and Men Share Logo by Jonathan Munk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Tips, Inspiration &#038; Discussion</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Theo Hucksdable</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo Hucksdable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>I may be very wrong or misled, but: Volvo has been using that "logo" since the 1920's...used to be cast out of solid iron &#38; welded to the front grill. Just because american "hippie" (wrong description, s/b "swinger") men didn't notice the emblem on the grill, doesn't make Volvo lacking or not on the ball. The void of interest or notice from the media/public only represents the absence of awareness &#38; understanding amongst masses. Volvo company philosophy etc... may not have been a match for the market climate in the 60's or 70's. You don't change your company focus or path just to appease a negligable and very variable market share (i.e.trends/fads), if so, then Volvo (world's largest indie auto maker until 1998) would have gone the way of GM...Oh yea, go do some research on greek and/or ancient symbols. You can't necessarily copywrite or what-not a shape or symbol, it is the created conseptual design or patterning that makes the logo unique, thus protectable. 
Good luck &#38; thank you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be very wrong or misled, but: Volvo has been using that &#8220;logo&#8221; since the 1920&#8217;s&#8230;used to be cast out of solid iron &amp; welded to the front grill. Just because american &#8220;hippie&#8221; (wrong description, s/b &#8220;swinger&#8221;) men didn&#8217;t notice the emblem on the grill, doesn&#8217;t make Volvo lacking or not on the ball. The void of interest or notice from the media/public only represents the absence of awareness &amp; understanding amongst masses. Volvo company philosophy etc&#8230; may not have been a match for the market climate in the 60&#8217;s or 70&#8217;s. You don&#8217;t change your company focus or path just to appease a negligable and very variable market share (i.e.trends/fads), if so, then Volvo (world&#8217;s largest indie auto maker until 1998) would have gone the way of GM&#8230;Oh yea, go do some research on greek and/or ancient symbols. You can&#8217;t necessarily copywrite or what-not a shape or symbol, it is the created conseptual design or patterning that makes the logo unique, thus protectable.<br />
Good luck &amp; thank you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogIntro</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogIntro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2005/10/20/volvo-and-men-share-logo%e2%80%94jonathan-munk/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Intorduced! on BlogIntro.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intorduced! on BlogIntro.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
