<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Tips, Inspiration &#038; Discussion</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deane</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>Deane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>Plus the apostrophe is upside down - should be a '9' not a '6'. D'oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus the apostrophe is upside down - should be a &#8216;9&#8242; not a &#8216;6&#8242;. D&#8217;oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - David</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/#comment-9953</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/joe-biden/#comment-9953</guid>
		<description>"Boom! It's Biden!" Nice bold first impression, but more attention should
have been paid to the details. 3 words. Clear message. Easy to read.

He uses the same font that most other candidates use as well, not a good
thing if you are trying to differentiate yourself from everyone else.
No first name used, perhaps to help something other than his logo stick in your mind.  Just too generic, no thought, no creativity, the Who, What, When approach.

With a somewhat complicated platform, he does make a simple statement.
The BIDEN looks almost like two different words, which looks unprofessional. And the
star looks like an afterthought, with no integration into the text. The
spacing above the star is sloppy.
Grade: C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Boom! It&#8217;s Biden!&#8221; Nice bold first impression, but more attention should<br />
have been paid to the details. 3 words. Clear message. Easy to read.</p>
<p>He uses the same font that most other candidates use as well, not a good<br />
thing if you are trying to differentiate yourself from everyone else.<br />
No first name used, perhaps to help something other than his logo stick in your mind.  Just too generic, no thought, no creativity, the Who, What, When approach.</p>
<p>With a somewhat complicated platform, he does make a simple statement.<br />
The BIDEN looks almost like two different words, which looks unprofessional. And the<br />
star looks like an afterthought, with no integration into the text. The<br />
spacing above the star is sloppy.<br />
Grade: C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
