<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Gravel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Tips, Inspiration &#38; Discussion</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wolf70</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/comment-page-1/#comment-27487</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/#comment-27487</guid>
		<description>This is not easy work, but the rewards are significant: a stronger civil society where all mem- bers feel included, respected, and responsible for building community. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not easy work, but the rewards are significant: a stronger civil society where all mem- bers feel included, respected, and responsible for building community. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/comment-page-1/#comment-9948</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/mike-gravel/#comment-9948</guid>
		<description>My first impression is the feeling that this
candidate is disjointed and unorganized. The flag overshadows the text, and
the designer makes the common mistake of putting the secondary text ABOVE
the name (which goes against the natural eye flow and creates a
slightly jarring effect)
There's too much going on here, from the small text to
the star filling in the A. I harp on this a lot, but it gives an
unprofessional feel to the entire logo when the letterspacing is off. With
so many competing elements, the logo does give exemplify his weak platform
of "diplomacy" on the issues that need a more concrete stance.
Grade: C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impression is the feeling that this<br />
candidate is disjointed and unorganized. The flag overshadows the text, and<br />
the designer makes the common mistake of putting the secondary text ABOVE<br />
the name (which goes against the natural eye flow and creates a<br />
slightly jarring effect)<br />
There&#8217;s too much going on here, from the small text to<br />
the star filling in the A. I harp on this a lot, but it gives an<br />
unprofessional feel to the entire logo when the letterspacing is off. With<br />
so many competing elements, the logo does give exemplify his weak platform<br />
of &#8220;diplomacy&#8221; on the issues that need a more concrete stance.<br />
Grade: C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

