Comments on: Sam Brownback http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/sam-brownback/ Logo Design Tips, Inspiration & Discussion Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:13:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Panel Expert - Paul http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/sam-brownback/#comment-9950 Panel Expert - Paul Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:07:40 +0000 http://www.logodesign.com/logo_design/2007/08/13/sam-brownback/#comment-9950 The first impression is a generic, traditional candidate with little experience. The font is unique for a presidential logo and it has a homey, traditional look. But the often overlooked letterspacing needs some work. The flag seems tacked on as an afterthought and does not tie in with the text. The "FOR PRESIDENT" is capitalized, so it looks like one solid shape, which is good. It should be moved up, though. Overall, there is not much to differentiate this logo from the pack, and that seems like Brownback's struggle in the race. With no clear position on a key issue like Iraq, for example, it's hard for the average voter to get behind him. Grade: F The first impression is a generic, traditional candidate with little
experience. The font is unique for a presidential logo and it has a homey,
traditional look. But the often overlooked letterspacing needs some work.
The flag seems tacked on as an afterthought and does not tie in with the
text.

The “FOR PRESIDENT” is capitalized, so it looks like one solid shape,
which is good. It should be moved up, though. Overall, there is not much to
differentiate this logo from the pack, and that seems like Brownback’s
struggle in the race. With no clear position on a key issue like Iraq, for
example, it’s hard for the average voter to get behind him.
Grade: F

]]>