This entry was posted
on Monday, April 10th, 2006 at 7:55 am and is filed under Logo Reviews.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The swirl/swoosh has no meaning, and it’s a major part of the logo. There are a lot of patriotic ideas that go with voting that you could use…at least do an abstract flag. I’m assuming he’s running for a government office. If so, use more appropriate colors. If not, then at least make the text dark blue to tie it in.
The swoosh is just overused, and should be used with caution. What is it about this logo that I can’t find anywhere else? What is it about this candidate that I can’t find in the alternative? These are the questions you should be asking beofre you even begin.
I suspect there are few entries here because no one knows quite what to say. This logo has been done a million times before - sometimes effectively, but more often than not, very poorly. This composition falls into the latter category. This logo has been given no thought whatsoever. So much of what we do as designers comes back to meaningful research and development. The result of that research is a design that is iconic, memorable, and serves a purpose. This logo hasn’t acheived any of those things.
Why so much pixelation around the swirls? And theres no diplomatic feel to it at all. honestly i tihnk you save as another logo got in paint and whited out the original. That whould explain the pixelation
Leave a Reply
NEED A LOGO?
Get a FREE Quote from Logoworks. Call 1.888.705.5646 or fill out the form below.
April 10th, 2006
The swirl/swoosh has no meaning, and it’s a major part of the logo. There are a lot of patriotic ideas that go with voting that you could use…at least do an abstract flag. I’m assuming he’s running for a government office. If so, use more appropriate colors. If not, then at least make the text dark blue to tie it in.
The swoosh is just overused, and should be used with caution. What is it about this logo that I can’t find anywhere else? What is it about this candidate that I can’t find in the alternative? These are the questions you should be asking beofre you even begin.
April 12th, 2006
I suspect there are few entries here because no one knows quite what to say. This logo has been done a million times before - sometimes effectively, but more often than not, very poorly. This composition falls into the latter category. This logo has been given no thought whatsoever. So much of what we do as designers comes back to meaningful research and development. The result of that research is a design that is iconic, memorable, and serves a purpose. This logo hasn’t acheived any of those things.
April 19th, 2006
Why so much pixelation around the swirls? And theres no diplomatic feel to it at all. honestly i tihnk you save as another logo got in paint and whited out the original. That whould explain the pixelation