<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zulfain Vision Logo Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/</link>
	<description>Logo Reviews and Education</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Allison Duine</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Allison Duine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I like the movement of the icon and use of color.  Not sure how well the design will reproduce under different conditions.  I think the design could work without the extrusions and gradients.  I always start with a flat design and embellish accordingly as opportunity allows. 

With regard to the text portion of the design, I cannot make out the spelling of the main word.  Is the green letter an “f”?  Also, the dot of the first “I” in vision is uncomfortably close to the top of the uppercase “V” in vision.  Maybe try making it non-italicized. Try playing around with some more legible fonts for the tagline.    

Overall, it is a good start; I might suggest dropping the size of the icon down a bit.  As it is now, it seems to overpower the wording.  Best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the movement of the icon and use of color.  Not sure how well the design will reproduce under different conditions.  I think the design could work without the extrusions and gradients.  I always start with a flat design and embellish accordingly as opportunity allows. </p>
<p>With regard to the text portion of the design, I cannot make out the spelling of the main word.  Is the green letter an “f”?  Also, the dot of the first “I” in vision is uncomfortably close to the top of the uppercase “V” in vision.  Maybe try making it non-italicized. Try playing around with some more legible fonts for the tagline.    </p>
<p>Overall, it is a good start; I might suggest dropping the size of the icon down a bit.  As it is now, it seems to overpower the wording.  Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Rob Kirby</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Rob Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>This logo needs to be simplified. There are too many elements. For example the t or f in Zultain doesn't need to be green. Keep all of the letters te same. Breaking it into two colors just fragments this signature logo and makes it less memorable. The tagline on the bottom looks like an afterthought. I would try a more legable font. I would also look at this logo in just one color and make sure everything is legible when shrunk down in size. The mark at the top is the strongest part of the logo and really needs a bolder font for the words Zultain Vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This logo needs to be simplified. There are too many elements. For example the t or f in Zultain doesn&#8217;t need to be green. Keep all of the letters te same. Breaking it into two colors just fragments this signature logo and makes it less memorable. The tagline on the bottom looks like an afterthought. I would try a more legable font. I would also look at this logo in just one color and make sure everything is legible when shrunk down in size. The mark at the top is the strongest part of the logo and really needs a bolder font for the words Zultain Vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Paul Browning</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Paul Browning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/04/24/zulfain-vision-logo-review/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Is it ZulTain? I cant tell if thats an F or a T. This logo would work well for web applications, but might lose clarity when shrunk or printed. And that font for the tagline needs to be re-thought. ot's hard to read, and better suited for a scrapbooking company. 

I also have a problem with the angles. They need to match each other to make the logo more cohesive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it ZulTain? I cant tell if thats an F or a T. This logo would work well for web applications, but might lose clarity when shrunk or printed. And that font for the tagline needs to be re-thought. ot&#8217;s hard to read, and better suited for a scrapbooking company. </p>
<p>I also have a problem with the angles. They need to match each other to make the logo more cohesive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
