<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TeasePlease.com Logo Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/</link>
	<description>Logo Reviews and Education</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Ben V.</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Ben V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>In my opinion the font you have chosen is hard to read. Maybe if you change the colors of the words as Paul suggested it would be easier to read. I don't know.

The .com needs to be changed. I worry that when this logo is shrunk down, the .com gets lost.

Good start, just needs a little tweaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion the font you have chosen is hard to read. Maybe if you change the colors of the words as Paul suggested it would be easier to read. I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>The .com needs to be changed. I worry that when this logo is shrunk down, the .com gets lost.</p>
<p>Good start, just needs a little tweaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Paul Browning</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Paul Browning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I don't mind the dot com and I like the font. It's different, bold and readable. I would make "tease" another color, though, so it can be read as a different word from "please. The shirt is confusing for a sign business. I like that it's simple, but I don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the dot com and I like the font. It&#8217;s different, bold and readable. I would make &#8220;tease&#8221; another color, though, so it can be read as a different word from &#8220;please. The shirt is confusing for a sign business. I like that it&#8217;s simple, but I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - David D.</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - David D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2006/06/05/teasepleasecom-logo-review/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Your company info said this was a sign business, but from the logo it looks like a silk screen business.  Your text is a little too tight and bold.  I appreciate the clean lines of the shirt, but maybe a little more depth would help it balance out the dominance of the words.  If the companies official name is teaseplease.com, then you might want to try wrapping the com around the top right of the dot, and decrease the dot size a little.  Right now it gets lost and will be worse when shrunk down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your company info said this was a sign business, but from the logo it looks like a silk screen business.  Your text is a little too tight and bold.  I appreciate the clean lines of the shirt, but maybe a little more depth would help it balance out the dominance of the words.  If the companies official name is teaseplease.com, then you might want to try wrapping the com around the top right of the dot, and decrease the dot size a little.  Right now it gets lost and will be worse when shrunk down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
