<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logo Design Review:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/</link>
	<description>Logo Reviews and Education</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Владимир Крылов</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5145</link>
		<dc:creator>Владимир Крылов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-5145</guid>
		<description>Интересный пост, очень интересно было почитать</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Интересный пост, очень интересно было почитать</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Тимур Лоськов</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5143</link>
		<dc:creator>Тимур Лоськов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-5143</guid>
		<description>Можно и поспорить по этому вопросу, ведь только в споре проявляется истина. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Можно и поспорить по этому вопросу, ведь только в споре проявляется истина. <img src='http://www.logodesign.com/logos/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bлacть</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bлacть</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>Я тоже так раньше думал, пока не увидел несколько аналогичных статей по этой же теме.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Я тоже так раньше думал, пока не увидел несколько аналогичных статей по этой же теме.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Всеволод Ильин</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Всеволод Ильин</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>Это действительно в точку!!! Иными словами и не скажешь! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Это действительно в точку!!! Иными словами и не скажешь! <img src='http://www.logodesign.com/logos/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeMel</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>LeMel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Wonderful drawing there - nice job.

The size ratio between the wordmark and the droplet will be a problem -  the detail in the droplet won't render well. Most logos never appear at this perceptual size: You are either looking at a small logo up close, or a big logo far away. Almost never a giant logo up close, unless you work for the company!

The windows on the house are just not going to survive scaling. Still, this feels like a good idea. Does it match the aspirations of the company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful drawing there - nice job.</p>
<p>The size ratio between the wordmark and the droplet will be a problem -  the detail in the droplet won&#8217;t render well. Most logos never appear at this perceptual size: You are either looking at a small logo up close, or a big logo far away. Almost never a giant logo up close, unless you work for the company!</p>
<p>The windows on the house are just not going to survive scaling. Still, this feels like a good idea. Does it match the aspirations of the company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoua</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>I have a suggestion for the drop with the house in it. What if the house became more like a smiling face? You could simplify it and associate the house within the drop with a positive image. I do not have ideas for integrating the graphic with the text, but I agree that it needs to be more connected, or even just pop a little. But I love it for its simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a suggestion for the drop with the house in it. What if the house became more like a smiling face? You could simplify it and associate the house within the drop with a positive image. I do not have ideas for integrating the graphic with the text, but I agree that it needs to be more connected, or even just pop a little. But I love it for its simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>I love your text.  It is strong and looks great in black. But for me, the icon feels too small. If you were to increase the size of your icon (so the lines within it are similar in size to the weight of the text) it would feel a lot more unified.  But personally, I don't feel that your icon is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your text.  It is strong and looks great in black. But for me, the icon feels too small. If you were to increase the size of your icon (so the lines within it are similar in size to the weight of the text) it would feel a lot more unified.  But personally, I don&#8217;t feel that your icon is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>Hi, I've sent my own logo in numerous times to be reviewed, and it's seemingly ignored. Please please e-mail me!! I presume you accept logos from UK start-ups? BTW nice logo Eric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;ve sent my own logo in numerous times to be reviewed, and it&#8217;s seemingly ignored. Please please e-mail me!! I presume you accept logos from UK start-ups? BTW nice logo Eric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>Tanner I do agree with the house details... I could probably lose the door and window and try to make the drop bigger... navy blue and black has almost never been a combination I like but the ruby red I think would work great... I could make those changes and put it back in this post (can this be done?) if you would like to see your suggestions applied...

eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanner I do agree with the house details&#8230; I could probably lose the door and window and try to make the drop bigger&#8230; navy blue and black has almost never been a combination I like but the ruby red I think would work great&#8230; I could make those changes and put it back in this post (can this be done?) if you would like to see your suggestions applied&#8230;</p>
<p>eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner Christensen</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2007/11/06/logo-design-review/#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, I love the font used for the logo, it's very clean and it gives off a great "corporate" vibe. I also agree with Jonathan about the symbol used at the end of the logotype. The icon would look horrible at small sizes (letterhead and envelopes for example).

The initial shape of the symbol is great, and getting rid of the house in the middle of the symbol, but keeping the outline, would make this logo great.

Finally, adding some color to the logo would really make it pop. Right now the black and white is very bland, a touch of navy blue or a ruby red would make this logo even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, I love the font used for the logo, it&#8217;s very clean and it gives off a great &#8220;corporate&#8221; vibe. I also agree with Jonathan about the symbol used at the end of the logotype. The icon would look horrible at small sizes (letterhead and envelopes for example).</p>
<p>The initial shape of the symbol is great, and getting rid of the house in the middle of the symbol, but keeping the outline, would make this logo great.</p>
<p>Finally, adding some color to the logo would really make it pop. Right now the black and white is very bland, a touch of navy blue or a ruby red would make this logo even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

