<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logo Design Review:  Prata Parque</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/</link>
	<description>Logo Reviews and Education</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>Generally, the darkest color should be the text. That way it's read the fastest. There are exceptions to this, but I wouldn't say this is one of them. 

Gradients are fine, but it shouldn't be a vital part of the design, like it is here. And I agree with Curt. It doesnt have the feel of a construction company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, the darkest color should be the text. That way it&#8217;s read the fastest. There are exceptions to this, but I wouldn&#8217;t say this is one of them. </p>
<p>Gradients are fine, but it shouldn&#8217;t be a vital part of the design, like it is here. And I agree with Curt. It doesnt have the feel of a construction company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Curt J.</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Curt J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>This logo does not say "real estate &#38; construction" to me.  It has the look and feel of a high tech or electronic company.  If this is the affect you were going for, great.

Also, the grey text is a little too light.  Right now it is about 30% black.  If you were to increase that to around 60 or 70%, it will be more legible and work best for all marketing purposes.

I agree with John's prior comment that the tagline is too small.  Try extending the tail of the "q"  down a little ways, and the extending the tagline text to meet the base of the "q."  This will give you a more custom look by tying the tagline and title together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This logo does not say &#8220;real estate &amp; construction&#8221; to me.  It has the look and feel of a high tech or electronic company.  If this is the affect you were going for, great.</p>
<p>Also, the grey text is a little too light.  Right now it is about 30% black.  If you were to increase that to around 60 or 70%, it will be more legible and work best for all marketing purposes.</p>
<p>I agree with John&#8217;s prior comment that the tagline is too small.  Try extending the tail of the &#8220;q&#8221;  down a little ways, and the extending the tagline text to meet the base of the &#8220;q.&#8221;  This will give you a more custom look by tying the tagline and title together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panel Expert - Tony Naccarato</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/comment-page-1/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>Panel Expert - Tony Naccarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>I think the font is fine for the "PrataParque" but the small test underneath should be put in a more readable font. Maybe a more traditional sans-serif font. Also, you need to look into the kerning of the letters. I don't really have a problem with the icon but I'm not a big fan of the gradient. 
I think you are off to a good start. Keep adjusting it and applying some of these comments and you'll come out with a good logo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the font is fine for the &#8220;PrataParque&#8221; but the small test underneath should be put in a more readable font. Maybe a more traditional sans-serif font. Also, you need to look into the kerning of the letters. I don&#8217;t really have a problem with the icon but I&#8217;m not a big fan of the gradient.<br />
I think you are off to a good start. Keep adjusting it and applying some of these comments and you&#8217;ll come out with a good logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/comment-page-1/#comment-3599</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/#comment-3599</guid>
		<description>I agree with John that the grey text should be darker. I would just completely drop the tagline underneath. I don't think it is necessary.
The graphic reminds me of a telecom/broadband provider and nothing to do with construction. I like the font and the look of it altogether, but I think it could use some minor reworking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with John that the grey text should be darker. I would just completely drop the tagline underneath. I don&#8217;t think it is necessary.<br />
The graphic reminds me of a telecom/broadband provider and nothing to do with construction. I like the font and the look of it altogether, but I think it could use some minor reworking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesign.com/logos/2008/01/03/logo-design-review-prata-parque/#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>The gray text is hard to read. I think that it needs to be darker. 
The bottom line of text should be larger as well. 

The graphic doesn't really say construction or real estate to me. I like the look of it but I question whether it sends any relevant message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gray text is hard to read. I think that it needs to be darker.<br />
The bottom line of text should be larger as well. </p>
<p>The graphic doesn&#8217;t really say construction or real estate to me. I like the look of it but I question whether it sends any relevant message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

